I'm currently writing the documentation for the API of my website.
I'm not sure about the "best" way to write the routes. I think twitter does a good job and I'd like to copy their url structure:
https://dev.twitter.com/docs/api
https://dev.twitter.com/docs/api/1/get/statuses/show/:id
https://dev.twitter.com/docs/api/1/post/statuses/retweet/:id
It would be something like:
namespace :docs do
resources :api do
# and then... not sure
end
end
Not sure on how to write the routes for this part: /get/statuses/show/:id
.
Should I just create a custom route?
match "/:verb/:resource/:action/:params" => "api#resource"
Or is there a better way?
What I ended up with, might help someone :)
Ibarcraft::Application.routes.draw do
def api_versions; [:v1] end
def api_verbs; [ :index, :show ] end
constraints subdomain: "api" do
scope module: "api", as: "api" do
versions = api_versions
versions.each do |version|
namespace version, defaults: { format: "json" } do
# all my routes
resources :barcrafts, only: api_verbs do
collection do
get :search
end
scope module: "barcraft" do
resources :users, only: [:index]
end
end
# and more...
end
end
match 'v:api/*path', to: redirect { |params, request| "/#{versions.last}/#{params[:path]}" + (params[:format] ? ".#{params[:format]}" : "") }
match '*path', to: redirect { |params, request| "/#{versions.last}/#{params[:path]}" + (params[:format] ? ".#{params[:format]}" : "") }
end
end
end
Yes you need custom route.
But note, that :action
key is reserved for controller's action name, better use something like :action_name